Biological information exists in different formats including: articles, books, and data. Sources can be primary, secondary, or tertiary. Authors of primary sources analyze data. Secondary and tertiary sources interpret and summarize other sources. Primary sources are often the most up-to-date, but can be difficult to read and understand. Secondary and tertiary sources are often easier to understand, but have undergone additional interpretation.
Primary Sources Original research, evidence, and analysis Examples: Research articles, Patents, Research data, Lab notes, Conference presentations, Clinical trials, Original models |
⇒ |
Secondary Sources Summaries, evaluations, or interpretations of others' research Examples: Review articles, Book reviews, Annotated bibliographies
|
⇒ |
Tertiary Sources Collections and summaries of primary and secondary sources Examples: Reference books, Dictionaries, Encyclopedias
|
Scientific research builds on the work of others.
Scientists share the methods, results, and conclusions of their research investigations through research articles. Most research articles are considered scholarly and undergo the peer-review process. Through the peer-review process, experts in the field evaluate the articles prior to publication. Research articles that have not undergone peer-review might not be reliable.
Review articles are another commonly used type of scientific literature. Authors of review articles read current research articles written by other authors then summarize or evaluate the information. Review articles often also undergo the peer-review process.
Example of a research article:
Gmutza, H. J., Foster, R. W., Gmutza, J. M., Carter, G. G., & Kurta, A. (2024). Survival of hibernating little brown bats that are unaffected by white-nose syndrome: Using thermal cameras to understand arousal behavior. Plos one, 19(2), e0297871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297871
Example of a review article:
Nyffeler, M., & Altig, R. (2020). Spiders as frog-eaters: a global perspective. The Journal of Arachnology, 48(1), 26-42.